When considering contributions to open-source projects, the focus often defaults to the technical development involved in building the codebase. However, creating a successful, functional project involves far more than just coding. Even before development begins, crucial groundwork like planning, discussion, and sometimes testing is required to define what will be built.
While I didn’t make design contributions myself, the Jellify community included many individuals who, despite not coding, possessed remarkable design skills. When new project components needed visual or user experience design, these contributors often stepped forward. For instance, Jellify lacked versions compatible with Apple CarPlay or smart TVs. Without writing a single line of code, community members skilled in design developed mockups. These mockups not only visually aligned with the existing application but also incorporated innovative ideas tailored to platform-specific usability. This design work was crucial for expanding potential outreach to users on these platforms and enhanced accessibility by providing developers with a clear visual target. This, in turn, saved development time and contributed to a more polished end product, demonstrating how non-coders can significantly shape a project’s user experience and future direction.
Discussion is another vital, and perhaps underrated, non-code contribution. I believe that evolving an initial idea into a feasible plan is one of the most challenging yet critical phases of any project. Being part of a community where ideas can be openly discussed and refined is an incredibly important step in creating successful and user-centered software. While I made no direct design contributions in terms of creating visual assets for Jellify, I actively participated in several Discord discussions, notably one concerning the menu bar for the app. By offering comparisons with other music streaming services, I helped the team consider different user experience (UX) approaches. This collaborative dialogue, drawing on diverse user perspectives, ultimately contributed to a more informed decision and a potentially more accessible and intuitive interface for all users.
For larger projects, the opportunities for non-code contributions expand further. For example, if a project begins to spread internationally, the need for localization into different languages becomes increasingly important. Jellify hasn’t reached this stage yet, but I can foresee a future where it will require individuals to translate the app’s interface and any accompanying documentation needed by other contributors. Furthermore, as communities grow, so does the need for comprehensive documentation to track code changes and improve accessibility for new contributors. Alongside this, more people will be needed to interact with an expanding user base, manage community forums, and handle social media or promotional activities that highlight new features or updates on ongoing development.
Leave a Reply